Sunday, June 24, 2012

Online Teaching FAQs

Untitled Document
Online Teaching: FAQs
Many trainers find that making the transition from strictly traditional classroom into hybrid or blended courses confusing. The following FAQs are meant to serve as a guide for those instructors who are about to take this plunge.
What are some of the pre-planning strategies I need to consider before converting to hybrid courses?
The trainer certainly needs to assess his/her students’ technological ability to access both the online training modules and the documents stored on a server.  While many office employees are familiar with servers, there will still be some minor training involved prior to beginning the courses. 
What aspects of his original training program could be enhanced in the distance learning format?
Building asynchronous discussion opportunities into the trainer’s course could certainly improve classroom communication.  Shy and reticent students often feel more comfortable sharing with peers in an online setting. By adding more voices to the conversation, the trainer may find the increased dialogue he was originally searching for. 
How will my role, as trainer, change in a distance learning environment?
In a distance learning environment the trainer may have to learn how to take a back seat.  Some traditional face-to-face instructors build courses that are teacher-centered, where the students are observers and recorders of the teacher’s knowledge. Distance learning, on the other hand, is student-centered.  The trainer will act as coach, guide, and counselor but it will be the student that creates (not records) the knowledge.
What steps should I take to encourage my trainees to communicate online?
Online communication can be encouraged through positive reinforcement by bringing the online communication into the classroom discussions.  Online communication can also be encouraged by building it into the syllabus and assessing the quality of the contributions, like we do in our Walden courses.

Sunday, June 3, 2012

OpenCourses

Untitled Document
Exploring OpenCourses at UC Berkeley
This week we were asked to investigate OpenCourses for their instructional design techniques.  I took a course in something I never heard of before: UC Berkeley professor Greg Niemeyer’s Art 23 lecture on “Onomastics: Names as Media.” (You can access this course by clicking here.)

My Experience
The course does have an outline, which Professor Niemeyer refers to around 1:15 of Lecture 1. However, it is very clear that he is talking about an overview which is written on the syllabus; a syllabus that the distance learners are not given access to. While the course appears to be full of interesting and new information, it is very clear that the distance learner was not considered in the design of this course. UC Berkeley must have decided to record their lectures and place them online for free as “OpenCourses.”
I love learning and think that OpenCourses are great ideas in principle. But the type of courses that UC Berkeley is labeling as “distance education” is like a case study in “what not to do.” The lectures are painful to listen to, provide no visualization of the professor and absolutely no interactivity. We even have to sit through technical difficulties like audio clips not playing (Lecture 1 at 04:00). 
I remember taking courses like this in college, and I loved them. But I loved them because there was something about the ambiance of being in the lecture hall, of seeing the professor’s physical expressions, of raising your hand and asking a question.  Watching a digital recording of the projector screen takes all the activity out of the learning experience.

Summary
I will not be returning to UC Berkeley’s OpenCourses. Not unless I need help falling asleep.